Subject: Fwd: Re: [burningcorn] One thing that wasn't too cool at B.C. --- In burningcorn@y..., Joseph Dunphy wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Gary Xaoui wrote: > I was busy blowing fire and missed some of the best burn stuff, I am glad to > know that it was documented. This is a age of media, people and recording > equipment are everywhere. No, Gary, it's not. We could get into some vague, handwaving debate about the spirit of the age, but that's beside the point. What is on point, is that this is very poor hospitality, and it simply isn't done, especially when the participants in question >aren't celebrities<, and do expect their privacy to be respected. On a personal level, had your friend approached me, and asked me if I would mind be photographed, I might have been willing to discuss the possibility with him. There are friends who have earned my trust to such an extent, that I've even told them to just go ahead any time they want, because I know it will be done with respect, and I feel comfortable with that. In some cases, I would even feel honored, whether I was clothed or nude at the time, just to be part of the person's work. A stranger playing paparozzi, however, is a much different feeling. So is being put on TV. That could get to be a nuisance. > Events like this are never private, people are > all around you, some are participating and others are not. Spectators while > not appreciated are still a reality. Well, there are spectators, and there are spectators. The people who go to an event like "Burning Corn", with a tiny handful of exceptions, are going to be so cool about almost anything you do, that you're going to feel comfortable about doing it in front of them. The people on Columbus Public Access TV, though ? God only knows. And it's not like Columbus is this tiny little town that none of us are ever likely to visit, or move to. This could be a problem. Now, if you were talking about a film intended to be shown to small audiences in coffeehouses, and other places where people again, would be cool with that, because they had made an effort to go out and see that kind of thing, I suspect that you'd find that almost everybody would be OK with that. But, again, you have to check with people, and Phil just didn't. It's not like I would have been hard to find, either. I was 6'4", naked, and out all night, going from camp to camp. How much more conspicuous could I have been ? Were that the case, as unfortunately it was not, it would be a simple matter to announce this at the beginning of the program, and, again, people would be put at ease. > If you would not want your behavior > viewed by others then you possibly should reconsider your motivation for > doing it. Which behavior ? Everything has its own audience. I certainly feel no shame for having made love to my ex-fiance, but would I want to have even my closest friends watch me do so ? Probably not. Nor would it be expected, or accepted, without the both of us agreeing. A gathering like this may not have the same level of intimacy, but it does have some, and it should. What is intended for those sharing an experience, is not necessarily intended, or appropriate for global distribution. This is a given, Gary ? No. It is unheard of. > the time. if there are things you do not want others to Hear, do not say > them, do not want others to read you most privet thoughts? Do not write them > down, same with how you act. If you don't do it then no one will see...... This begins to sound a little like "1984". Choose between your privacy, and your freedom ? > I guess I just live my life in such a way as to not need to 'let my hair > down' or 'cut loose' by living life the way I want to and not caring so much > what society thinks. Yeah, well, Gary, part of the point, here, is that if you want a festival to be a festival, you have to create an environment in which people feel comfortable enough to get there, in their own time, in their own way. Placing videocameras there kind of closes off that option. > Would I be bothered by images of me dancing > around the fire necked being posted or shown to my Family, friends, or > boss/coworkers. No not really Me, neither. There's a drawing of me from an art class that I modeled for, that is hanging in my aunt's room, right now. It's a nice piece of art. But, even when it is something that we are comfortable with, it is always about consent. One has the right to be asked, and the right to say "no", and have that wish respected. So, first things first. ASK. And, like I said, other people will feel otherwise. We are, perhaps, not so far apart on all points. I, too, would like to see people feel free to put aside arbitrary social conventions, to the extent that the circumstances make practical. If that happened enough, those circumstances would eventually be a lot more relaxed. If you arent' ready to honor their boundaries, people aren't going to be getting there. Where I take serious issue, is with your "all or nothing" approach. Either one should wear a three piece business suit into the shower, or be willing to hang nude from a Trapeze in Times Square on the Jumbotron, it would seem. I think that the world may have room for a little more middle ground than that. >, it might give me some difficult explaining > and describing of the circumstance to do but if they cannot handle it and it > was not illegal. then its not my problem. Now if someone were taking my > recognizable image and making big money off of it. (Like selling a tape of > "Weirdo Tall White Artist Guys Caught On Tape", or "Worlds Worst Nude Male > Firedancers #2" ) I would definitely want my cut!!! If somebody was making money off my nude image, I probably wouldn't make an issue about cash, as I do believe that this would be one of the seven signs of the apocalypse. > I am eager to see more. > GXAOUI As am I, but only when it is done with respect, and that means consensually. No more camera ambushes, OK ? That wasn't nice. Joe --- End forwarded message ---