Original Copy On Dejanews

From: john1@kalypso.cybercom.net (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: Joseph Dunphy for KotM!
Date: 24 Oct 1995 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <john1.814574428@cybercom.net>
distribution: inet
references: <45orgh$gct@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <john1.814210107@cybercom.net> <imp-2010952126120001@198.69.34.32> <46argc$dsj@news.eecs.umich.edu> <46bq2i$n89@nntp208.reach.com>
organization: Johns & Call Girls United Against Repression
newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.censorship, alt.homosexual, alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.sex, alt.sex.services, alt.sex.brothels, soc.men, soc.women, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.mens-rights, ne.motss, soc.motss, soc.culture.israel, soc.culture.african.american, alt.current-events.net-abuse, comp.org.eff.talk, news.admin.net-abuse.misc, soc.singles, talk.rumors, alt.christnet.bible, alt.christnet,alt.christnet.sex, alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now, alt.atheism

jpetrynn@counsel.com writes:

> fields@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Matthew H. Fields) wrote:

> >
> >
> >
> > Can dunphy and cherry share the honors?

> That is a motion that I will second. All those in favor of Dunphy and
> Cherry being designated as Kooks of the Month, say "aye".

I would prefer to NOT share the honors with Dunphy. That is, I would prefer to have the homors all to myself. So, perhaps the honors could go to Dunphy one month, and to me the next month. Or, me first and Dunphy second.

On the other hand, the two of us together make a much stonger ticket than one of us alone. So, mayby the suggestion that the two of us share the honors is really the best suggestion.

*************************************************************************

Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - Lincoln

john1@cybercom.net


return