Original Copy On Dejanews

From: john1@kalypso.cybercom.net (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: Heterosexual Filthy Practices
Date: 28 Oct 1995 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <john1.814911660@cybercom.net>
distribution: inet
references: <43nk40$f3m@ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca> <DFA173.DMA@austin.ibm.com> <444s3 4$30j@classic.iinet.com.au> <44646j$bl5@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <447kd8$nej@ixne ws5.ix.netcom.com> <469301$clj@homer.alpha.net> organization: Johns & Call Girls United Against Repression
newsgroups: alt.sex.bestiality, alt.censorship, alt.homosexual, alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.sex, alt.sex.services, alt.sex.brothels, soc.men, soc.women, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.mens-rights, ne.motss, soc.motss, soc.culture.israel, soc.culture.african.american, alt.current-events.net-abuse, comp.org.eff.talk, news.admin.net-abuse.misc, soc.singles, talk.rumors, alt.christnet.bible, alt.christnet, alt.christnet.sex, alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now, alt.atheism


In Message-ID: <469301$clj@homer.alpha.net>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.christnet, alt.christnet.bible Subject: Heterosexual Filthy Practices
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 21:06:51 GMT
eeaaee@mixcom.com (Apuleius) wrote:

> I can't understand why the press is so gentle with the
> so-called "Religious Right", the so-called "Conservative
> Christians". The best I can think is that editors and reporters
> are simply ignorant of what is actually being done by these
> fundamentalist-evangelicals, or "Christians", as they style
> themselves.

> Conservative Christians are handled with kid gloves by the news
> media, yet when there is even the mildest criticism of them,
> they complain that they are victims of nazi-like persecution.
> This appeal to martyrdom is belied by the scurrilous propaganda
> that these "Christians" publish. Those who circulate the sort of
> distorted, hate-filled propaganda that emanates from
> conservative Christian souces are themselves more likely
> candidates for the "nazi" label than are those whom they accuse.

> Consider the case of "filthy homosexual practices". It has now
> become the habit for conservative Christians, in their speech,
> letters, printed material, video tapes, and radio and television
> broadcasts, to accuse homosexuals of "filthy practices", such as
> "feces eating". When these Christians resort to numbers in an
> attempt to lend credence to their charges, their claim is that
> something like 92% of homosexuals derive sexual pleasure from
> "feces eating".

Whether you admit it or not, there definitely IS an association between male homosexuals and feces eating. Male homosexuals enjoy sticking their tongues up the rectums of other homosexuals. This practice is so prevalent in the homosexual community that homosexuals have coined a word for it. In homosexual circles this practice is known as "rimming."

Quite a few homosexuals enjoy looking at pornography which features feces eating. Consider the movie: SALO, OR THE 120 DAYS OF SODOM. That's a homosexual movie which features feces eating. A video tape of this movie was offered for sale in THE ADVOCATE, issue of 1/15/91, page 19. THE ADVOCATE is the largest-selling and most influential homosexual magazine in the United States. I believe I have seen that same ad in other issues of that magazine, or else in other homosexual magazines.

I remember actually seeing the movie about 15 years ago. The movie is a remaking of the Marquis de Sade's story: THE 120 DAYS OF SODOM. The movie was made in Europe. the producer found a number of actors and actresses who appeared to be children in the age range from 10 to 12 years of age. These actors and actresses were playing children so convincingly, that I certainly could not tell the difference between them and real children of that age range. In the movie, among other things, the children are forced to eat feces. They are also subjected to just about every other sort of perversion and brutality anyone can think of.

Now, here's why I say that this is a homosexual movie. First of all, it was written and produced by the well-known homosexual movie-maker Pier Paolo Pasolini. Second, it was advertised for sale in a homosexual magazine. And third, it is based on a story by the notorious evil monster the Marquis de Sade. De Sade, as I have discovered, was homosexual. I have clear and convincing evidence of that fact. Here it is.

Excerpt from PORNOGRAPHY, by Andrea Dworkin, Perigee Books, a division of P.G. Putnam's sons, First Printing, 1981, ISBN 0-399-50532-6(pbk.), page 96

The message that women are evil and must be punished permeates Sade's work, whether the female figures in question are supposed to represent good or evil. The vileness of women and an intense hatred of female genitalia are major themes in every Sadean opus. Both male and female characters evince a deep aversion to and loathing of the vagina. Anal penetration is not only preferred; often the vagina must be hidden for the male to be aroused at all.

Dworkin undoubtedly doesn't realize the implications of what she is writing. It is only homosexual men who have a loathing for the vagina.

By the way, do you want to know why I saw that movie? I had read a review of the movie and I knew what I was letting myself in for. I wanted to see if it was actually as bad as the review said it was. It was worse.

Now, here is something else to consider. In addition to being a client of women prostitutes, I am also a connoissewer of pornography. I am even mentioned in the first U.S. government report on pornography and obscenity. That's the report that was issued during the Nixon presidency, and not to be confused with the Meese Report issued during Reagan's presidensity. I have litigated for the right to import pornography for private use. See, in almost any law library, United States of America v. Various Articles of "Obscene" Merchandise, 315 F. Supp. 191 & Cherry v. Secretary of the Treasury, 460 F. Supp. 606. The government allows this piece of shit (the movie SALO) to be imported into the United States without a murmur, while the material I try to import, consisting typically of photographs of charming young (adult) ladies amusing themselves by abusing themselves, is condemned and burned in a fiery furnace.

> As Jews have been victims of the "blood libel" spread by
> certain Christians in certain periods of history, so gays and
> lesbians are now victims of the "feces libel" that is being
> spread today in America by conservative Christians who claim to
> "love their neighbors as themselves".

This is unbelievable. Here we have a homonazi who pretends to sympathize with Jews. And yet, in another posting, this man was spouting Nazi propaganda. Here is this man's Nazi propaganda, under the dashed line.

----------------------------------snip---------------------------------

From: eeaaee@mixcom.com (Apuleius)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bestiality, alt.censorship, alt.homosexual, alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.sex, alt.sex.services, alt.sex.brothels, soc.men, soc.women, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.mens-rights, ne.motss, soc.motss, soc.culture.israel, soc.culture.african.american, alt.current-events.net-abuse, comp.org.eff.talk, news.admin.net-abuse.misc, soc.singles, talk.rumors, alt.christnet.bible, alt.christnet, alt.christnet.sex, alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now, alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Where does which Bible condem Homosexuality?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 21:05:02 GMT
Organization: Alpha.net -- Milwaukee, WI
Lines: 21
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <4692sj$cl4@homer.alpha.net>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950909080759.22957E-100000@garcia.efn.org> <42vi1e$6 rh@eaglecap.eosc.osshe.edu> <Pine.SUN.3.91.950911072124.704D-100000@garcia.efn. org> <43b5mn$ofn@classic.iinet.com.au> <43cq0u$lt4@hearst.cac.psu.edu> <43ds9v$ fc7@classic.iinet. com.au> <john1.811352709@earth> <43nvgi$204u@news.gate.net> <DF8Kuy.12z@iglou.c om> <john1.811691108@earth> <43tha8$1qt4@news.gate.net> <john1.811764612@earth <440rck$sje@NNTP.MsState.Edu> <john1.811868380@earth> <44bts4$15j@hydra.acs.ttu .edu> <john1.81239 8970@cybercom.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial42-239.mixcom.com
Xref: shore alt.sex.bestiality:20335 alt.censorship:65930 alt.homosexual:1614 a lt.politics.homosexuality:82348 alt.sex:256858 alt.sex.services:25158 soc.men:1 11023 soc.women:117859 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:285498 alt.mens-rights:19306 ne.mo tss:5249 soc.motss :226187 soc.culture.israel:28710 soc.culture.african.american:124845 alt.curren t-events.net-abuse:28219 comp.org.eff.talk:58300 news.admin.net-abuse.misc:1930 4 soc.singles:177363 talk.rumors:14985 christnet.bible:10134 christnet.general: 13843 alt.atheism: 220605

> The only parts of the Bible I accept are the Books of the Maccabees. This
> is NOT in the Kink James version of the Bible, but it is in the Douay
> (Roman Catholic) version of the Bible. These books describe how my Glorious
> Ancestors, the Maccabees fought and won a war against homosexual
> oppression. This material may also be found in "The Oxford Annotated Bible
> with the Apocrypha, Revised Standard Version", New York, Oxford University
> Press, 1965.

Pagans were quite tolerant of other religions. Those not acceptable were usually ones having political overtones deemed dangerous to the state.

Judaism brought INTOLERANCE into Western Civilization.

What goes around, comes around.

There is a straight and narrow road running from Leviticus to Auschwitz.

----------------------------------snip---------------------------------

Now, before any more of you homonazis criticize me for excessive crossposting, let me remind you that none of you objected when this homonazi Apuleius crossposted HIS Nazi propaganda to the same newsgroups I am now posting this message.

*************************************************************************

Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - Lincoln

john1@cybercom.net


return