Original text in Dejanews

From: jik@annex-1-slip-jik.cam.ov.com (Jonathan Kamens)
Subject: Re: Joseph Dunphy 's attack on soc.culture.israel
Date: 22 Dec 1995 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <4bdvuo$8hb@jik.datasrv.co.il>
sender: jik@jik.datasrv.co.il (Jonathan Kamens)
references: <4b9ont$aem@jik.datasrv.co.il> <4bafr8$due@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4bajs9$9k3@Venus.mcs.com> <4balkr$lpf@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4bc652$age@Venus.mcs.com>
to: karl@MCS.COM (Karl Denninger)
cc: jik
organization: jik's Linux box
newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc

In article <4bc652$age@Venus.mcs.com>, karl@MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes:

|> If you have a *new* issue to raise, a contemporary one,
|> then do it through the proper channels. Make your
|> allegations and list specifics, backed by evidence.
|> Send the email to "news@mcs.net" or "usenet@mcs.net".

You respond to E-mail sent to postmaster@mcs.com, but you won't process complaints sent there.

Then you say that complaints should be sent to root@mcs.com.

Now you say that complaints should be sent to postmaster@mcs.net or usenet@mcs.net.

Somehow I suspect that all of these addresses point at you. Which means that somehow I suspect that you're doing nothing more than giving us the runaround in order to avoid doing anything about the misbehavior of your users.

|> It will be investigated based on the evidence you
|> provide. If you can substantiate an actual violation
|> of our policy, sanctions can be imposed. We do in fact
|> impose them when warranted.

Really? Name one case when you did. No names, just the circumstances and the sanctions you imposed.

|> If you're trying to silence someone you disagree with,
|> however, then my answer is "tough cookies kiddo". Give
|> it up now; that battle is pointless with our firm or
|> with me personally.

I don't care what Mr. Dunphy says. I have no interest in the topics of his postings, and indeed, I don't even know what his views are. I just don't want him posting them in soc.culture.israel.

|> Many others before you have tried to shut people up
|> they don't like or disagree with, and none have succeeded.
|> That record extends over almost 8 years now since I've
|> been providing Usenet access to the public, which
|> likely exceeds your total time on the net.

I've been providing services to the Usenet for longer than you've been providing public access, and I've never made a cent for any of it. Neener neener. (In other words, who cares how long you've been providing public access to the Usenet? If you're allowing your users to abuse the Usenet and the people on it, then you're not running your site properly. End of story.)


return