From: john1@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) Subject: Fred "Kiddie-Porn" Cherry Date: 1999/04/16 Message-ID: #1/1 Organization: The World, Public Access Internet, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: soc.women [ Article crossposted from alt.flame.fucking.faggots,soc.motts,alt.politics.hom osexuality,soc.culture.jewish,alt.censorship,misc.legal,alt.support.crosspostin g ] [ Author was Fred Cherry ] [ Posted on Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:33:55 GMT ] In Message-ID: Newsgroups: alt.flame.fucking.faggots Subject: Fred "Kiddie-Porn" Cherry Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:52:13 -0500 shrapnel@LICEenteract.com (Allen James, NAMBLA supporter), wrote: > UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT > SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK > > ----------------------------------------X > Fred Cherry, : > PLAINTIFF, : 96_Civ.______ > -v- : > : COMPLAINT > JANET RENO, in her official capacity as : > ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, : > : > DEFENDANT. : > ----------------------------------------X > PRELIMINARY STATEMENT > > 1. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief > challenging provisions of the "Communications Decency Act of 1996" > (the challenged provisions are referred to hereinafter as "the > Act"). One provision imposes criminal penalties for "indecent" but > constitutionally protected telecommunications to individuals under > the age of 18; another criminalizes the use of any "interactive > computer service" to "send" or "display in a manner available" to > a person under 18 any communication that "depicts or describes, in > terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community > standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs." The > plaintiff, a user of computer communication systems, asserts that > the Act is unconstitutional on its face and as applied because it > criminalizes expression that is protected by the First Amendment; > > ________________________________________ > > In other words, O Fans Of Fred Cherry, he SUED the Government because > they made child pornography on the Internet ILLEGAL. > > Jeez, what a lowlife you are, Fred. What a liar you are, Allen! Sure, you quoted the first paragraph of my complaint. But you neglected to tell the rest of the story. First of all, what you quoted, except for the last sentence, is what I copied exactly from the Complaint in the case of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. v. Reno, Civ. No. 96-963 In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The reason I filed that suit, as you well know, is that the notorious Rod Swift, a neonazi, and another NAMBLA supporter, was using indecent language to lie about me. Since this neonazi NAMBLA supporter was an Australian citizen, posting from Australia, he was not subject to the Communications Decency Act of 1996. All I was trying to do was to defend my right to quote this neonazi faggot NAMBLA supporter. john1@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) Elector of Homophobia