From: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis)
Subject: Re: COMPUSERVE under Full Active UDP
Date: 23 Nov 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <EK2svp.nzF@ferret.ocunix.on.ca>
References: <EJtqsC.AKG@nonexistent.com> <m3yb2lenur.fsf@windlord.Stanford.EDU>
<EJw1Jt.659@nonexistent.com> <65714i$mf7@shell2.shore.net>
Organization: eh?
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,alt.support.crossposting,alt.censorship
In article <65714i$mf7@shell2.shore.net>, Fred Cherry <john1@shore.net> wrote:
>Lysander Spooner wrote:
>>
I suppose it might have been better if the letters U-D-P were in the
>>
subject-line of the threads, but what purpose would have been served
>>
by a long drawn-out discussion? The "usual suspects" would show up
>>
and call us pedophiles. Lots of people would tell us that we should
>>
UDP _their_ Evil-ISP-of-Choice instead, and flame-wars would ensue
>>
about why foo.net deserves it more than bar.net. etc etc.
>I guess you don't remember President Harry Truman. Truman said: "If you
>can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."
Lysander knows it quite well, I assure you.
>By the way, who are the "usual suspects" who would show up and call you
>pedophiles? Tell us, please, who they are.
Does the phrase GruBoursyVulisMaharajJamesGonsalezGoat mean anything to you?
>You think you have problems with people calling you pedophiles? Just try
>posting something in response to a post by NAMBLA (The North American Man-
>Boy Love Association - the largest and most powerful organization of
>homosexual child-molesters in the world). If your response criticizes
>NAMBLA, you can expect anything to happen, from mailbombs to mass
>complaints to your ISP provider demanding that your ISP provider silence
>you. Here is just ONE example of the problems I have had with a NAMBLA
>supporter:
T'is nothing comparatively speaking.
--
Rumours of my demise are greatly exaggerated.
For more information on spam, see http://spam.abuse.net/spam
Fight spam, support Rep. Chris Smith's TCPA extension: http://www.cauce.org