Mast
Good Chemistry
s there really better living through chemistry? For Janet Hickman, the answer is “yes.”  She was recognized recently by her peers for her ongoing work as the product steward for perchloroethylene at the Dow Chemical Company when she received the prestigious Young Timers L. Frank Wright Award from the Textile Care Allied Trades Association at its annual convention.
 “It was a real surprise and a humbling experience,” Janet said. “To me, it‘s such an honor because I so enjoy working with all of the people that belong to TCATA. I always learn so much when I attend their educational sessions. I learn a different perspective by listening to people. If I didn’t participate, I’d never gain that perspective.”
 Janet first joined Dow in Midland, MI, in 1974.  Dow interviewed Janet that year while she was graduating from the University of Kansas with a B.S. in Chemistry.  
 Janet had spent most of her life in Kansas — her hometown is Seneca —  but she had lived with her family in Ann Arbor, MI, for a  while prior to her teenage years. Having lived in Michigan before, she felt more comfortable accepting the job even though it took her a long way from her close-knit family in Kansas.
 Knowing a company as large as Dow — it currently records annual sales in the billions and has employees numbering near 50,000 — could offer many product areas in which to specialize and various job functions to perform, Janet felt she would always have enough challenges there to stimulate her intellectual curiosity.
 Since she began her career with Dow, Janet has spent a lot of her time impacting the drycleaning industry by pursuing two of her interests passionately: researching chemicals and exchanging information with others.
“I like to have something that challenges me,” she explained. “I guess the thing that really drives me is the whole idea about learning, and, when you learn something, share what you know with someone else and use the opportunities that you have to learn from other people. That was part of why I came to Dow in the first place.”

When Janet first enrolled at the University of Kansas, her initial inclination was to be a history major. However, she changed her direction when she was required to take a science course to earn enough credits for her degree.
“I picked a chemistry course,” she recalled. “The professor who taught the course — his name was Carl Bricker — was so dynamic and passionate about teaching and sharing a love of science. It really got me excited and interested.”
 Soon after, she worked with another chemistry department professor, Richard Givens, who taught her the importanct art of research. He helped her hone her ability to investigate information. “He was my mentor,” she said.
When Janet first started with Dow, she was assigned a job, appropriately enough, in a research group. “We did what we call process support, which was in support of one of the production facilities,” she said. “So, if a production facility was having a problem, then the research people in the group were expected to figure out what was going on and fix it.”
Some of the research she performed kept Janet busy in a laboratory at Dow. In 1976, it was there that she discovered some chemistry with Andy, her husband of 26 years. The couple have two daughters: Patty, a sous chef at a gourmet restaurant named Hattie’s in Sutton Bay, MI; and Kathy, a junior at Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids, MI, who studies physical therapy for athletes.
“I’m just so proud of them,” Janet said. “They’ve both figured out things that interest them and they have a passion for. That’s so important, to really love what you do.”

er own passion has kept Janet busy at Dow over the years. She has held various positions, including marketing and technical service and development. During one stint, Janet worked on a project with reverse osmosis membranes, which are used to desalt water.
“I really enjoyed that,” she recalled. “I worked with individuals from engineering firms to municipalities that were looking at using the technology for their public drinking water to corporations that had to purify water that they were going to use in their processes.”
 In 1988, Janet moved into the area of chlorinated organics, which includes perc, methylene chloride and trichloroethylene. Not only does Janet’s work influence the drycleaning industry, but the solvents she works with have applications in metal degreasing, industrial adhesives and the pharmaceutical industry.
 Solvent use was significantly different back in the late 1980s. “Whether it was vapor degreasing for industrial metal parts or drycleaning with perc, back in 1988 the equipment wasn’t nearly as sophisticated as it is today.  One of our biggest activities was putting the information together to help people use the products more efficiently, which, when you’re dealing with chemicals, also means more safely.”
 Because she didn’t have enough time or resources to call drycleaners individually, Janet worked directly with distributors, who in turn would promote more efficient solvent use from all of their customers.
 “You really have to work at bringing value to your customer so that your customer can be successful,” she explained. “If you teach a customer how to use less, and be more efficient, in what they do and do a better job and run their operations in a way that is safer for the environment, that means they’re going to be in business longer. So, they’ll be buying products from you longer.”

ome of Janet’s job functions have changed as regulations on chlorinated solvents have increased. In addition to working with solvent distributors, she spends a lot of time talking to regulators.
“The unfortunate thing is, you have to maintain perspective. When somebody in a regulatory agency first starts working with a regulatory agency regulation, it’s another project, just different from the last one. The first thing they do is look up how it used to be done the last time their agency addressed the issue. That may have been several years ago and can lead to some unfortunate assumptions,” Janet said.
“If you look at the latest TCATA figures, perc use has gone down 72% over the last ten years. Consumption has gone down dramatically,” she said. “Basically, improvements in the safety and handling of products caused this decline. I try to make sure that people understand how perc drycleaning is done today versus how it was done ten or fifteen years ago because it’s so different.”
In order to keep others updated on the latest information, Janet constantly researches data. She works with several organizations, including the International Fabricare Institute and the State Coalition for the Remediation of Dry Cleaners. She chairs the Regulatory Affairs Committee at the Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance; the committee on chlorinated solvents for the American Society for Testing Materials; and the Government Affairs Committee for TCATA, where she also serves on their H.E.L.P. Committee and their board of directors.
“I spend a lot of time just trying to keep up on different kinds of information,” she said. “Everybody has regulations to deal with, so you not only have to keep up on what the regulations are, but interact with people on what future regulations might look like. It’s a lot of reading just to keep up to speed.”
Of course, Janet’s scientific mind realizes predicting the future is almost impossible.
“You never know what any particular state regulatory agency is going to do, or even a local agency like South Coast Air Quality Management District,” she said, referring to the group’s proposal for a ban of perc in a four county area of California by 2020.
“I don’t see perc being banned,” she added. “I think there are going to be regulations on how you use perc and they’re probably going to get tighter because all regulations are getting tighter. But, I think with the technology that exists, it’s going to be very manageable to deal with those regulations as they come in the future.”
In terms of the drycleaning industry, Janet predicts that perc is going to continue to be the standard against which alternative solvents are measured, although she cannot say how long that will be.
“I’m a scientist,” she said. “I’m a chemist by training, so I know that eventually somebody’s going to come up with something that’s better than perc, but I don’t have a crystal ball to say when that’s going to be.”
Ironically, Janet points to how perc’s reduction of usage in past years suggests that it will be around for a while.
“I think that the thing we have to be careful of when we look at perc in drycleaning, as an example, is to not equate reduction in consumption volume with getting toward the end of the product’s life cycle because it is precisely that reduction in consumption volume that helps extend the life of its product,” she noted.
“Every product has a life cycle,” Janet continued. “There are a lot of things you can do to change or extend the life cycle of a product. I think what we’ve seen in the last few years are the things that have extended perc’s life cycle — and that’s the equipment improvements and the pollution prevention practices used today. I think those are the kinds of things that are going to continue to extend the lifetime of perc.”
hanger
Janet Hickman
Hickman