|
|
||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Editorials
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
They’re on your side. Are you on
theirs?
By the time you read this, it may be all
over in California, including the shouting. The South Coast Air
Quality Management District may succeed in its quest to become
the first regulatory authority in the nation to prohibit the
use of perc in drycleaning, but whether that battle is won or
lost, we have learned some worthwhile lessons.
First and foremost, we have seen the
importance of an industry unified and coordinated through its
trade associations. Imagine a thousand individual cleaners each
trying to address a powerful regulatory agency. Does any one
cleaner have the time to study all the documents, show up at
all the hearings, and continually monitor developments over a
period of months or years? How many have the expertise to
comprehend the scientific issues being presented and develop
counter arguments that can hold sway in a roomful of people who
make their careers as regulators?
So what, you may say, these agencies just
go ahead and do whatever they want, anyway. Sometimes it seems
that way, but it’s not really so. Time and again we have
seen regulatory proposals modified after industry leadership
presented its case on behalf of all cleaners. The South Coast
rule is one example. Without industry intervention, the perc
ban would have been adopted a year ago, and in a form that
would have been even harder on cleaners who are trying to make
a living using perc.
More recently, cleaners got together
through their associations to appeal to a Chicago alderman who
wants to ban perc completely by June of next year. He seems to
understand now that such a draconian measure is probably not
necessary and certainly not practical.
And consider this: If a new law forces you
to stop using perc, how will you cope? How would you decide
which of the alternatives to select? How would you learn to use
that alternative effectively? Where will you turn for help? If
the Chicago perc ban were to be passed tomorrow, these are
questions a perc-using cleaner would have about six months to
answer. Is that enough time for a crash course on how to save
your business?
The answers will come from your trade
association, if you have one. If you don’t, try pulling
the answers of your hat or your back pocket — and good
luck. We’re betting that the cleaners who have a strong
trade association to rely on are the ones who will survive.
Make sure they know you’re out there
Every five years, the Commerce
Department’s Census Bureau undertakes a Herculean quest.
This year will be no different. Five million 2002 Economic
Census forms will soon be sent out to every mid-sized and large
company in America. Several smaller companies will be targeted,
too. The object of the quest is simple: to obtain information.
It’s quite mind-boggling when you
think about it: Five million forms full of questions, some
tailored specifically for each industry in America, and they
are sent to every geographic area in the country. The Bureau
leaves no zip code upturned.
The project is so immense in scope that it
takes a full year to analyze and record all of the data.
Results for the 2002 Economic Census won’t even be
available until 2004, making the figures seem a little
outdated. Yet, that doesn’t undermine their usefulness.
After all, the Economic Census is our country’s best
statistical barometer when it comes to understanding our
national economy. The numbers from the census are used by
federal agencies as a measuring tool for economic activity in
the U.S. Even state and local agencies rely on it for economic
development and regional planning. Additionally, it gives each
industry a historical overview of its own economic trends.
With that in mind, it hardly seems
necessary to remind business owners that if they receive census
forms in the mail, it is imperative they fill them out
truthfully and return them in a timely fashion — by the
Feb. 12, 2003 due date set forth by the Bureau. Though the law
requires it — those who fail to report can pay a penalty
up to $500 and those who deliberately report inaccurate data
can pay up to $10,000 — that really shouldn’t
matter. Instead, business owners should be encouraged to fill
the forms out because it is for the good of their industry, as
well as their country. After all, data cannot be
insightful or helpful unless it is accurate. For that reason
alone, it is worth the time it takes to fill in all the blanks.
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
