|
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
South Coast adopts perc phase-out
Two years of debate and discussion ended
with a split decision last month when the South Coast Air
Quality Management District voted
to let cleaners continue using perc through 2020.
On the one hand, the board’s ruling
represented some gains for the industry from the initial
proposal which would have ended perc use by 2010 and forced
many cleaners to buy new equipment much sooner. But the
industry had argued for a plan calling for replacement of older
perc equipment over several years while allowing perc use to
continue indefinitely.
At the Dec. 6 board meeting, it appeared
the industry might get its way after board chairman William
Burke introduced a plan that would have reduced perc use
without an elimination date. But the 2020 date was added to the
plan before the final vote was taken.
The first portions of the new set of rules
kick in immediately. As of January 1, 2003, there can be no new
perc facilities in the four-county South Coast area. Also, any
facility adding an additional machine must use non-perc
technology.
The next date in the phase-out schedule
come July 1, 2004, when all machines that have been converted
from vented to non-vented must be replaced with perc machines
that have primary and secondary controls (fourth generation) or
with non-perc technology.
Finally, by November 2007, all perc
equipment must be equipped with primary and secondary controls.
Within those restrictions, SCAQMD says
drycleaners can continue using perc until 2020, with one caveat:
they must also comply with another air district rule, Number
1402, which limits the lifetime cancer risk of a facility to no
more than 25 in one million.
That risk is based on a formula that takes
into account the amount of perc used, proximity or neighboring
businesses or residences and weather patterns. The calculations
will be different for each cleaner based on those factors, but
for some it could result in the air district ordering
restrictions on their perc use.
The risk factor calculations and possible
usage restrictions could become contentious sooner rather than
later. A spokesman for the air quality district told the Los
Angeles Times that the district is developing a letter to send
to all drycleaners seeking information to determine their risk
level — distance from houses and businesses, the kind of
cleaning equipment they have and the amount of perc they use.
Jon Meijer of the International
Fabricare Institute said
the air board “clearly intended for cleaners to have
until 2007 to make any decision on their equipment.” But
if the SCAQMD staff uses survey results to make some plants
upgrade their equipment sooner, the industry “will likely
go back to the board for a clarification of the board’s
intent or possibly file a legal challenge,” Meijer said.
South Coast officials believe that no more
than 20 percent of cleaners can meet the 25 in one million
standard. Industry leaders, however, believe that most cleaners
using modern equipment should be able to meet the standard.
The difference of opinion centers on key
point of contention between the industry and the air district
staff. Air officials believe 50 percent of the perc used by
cleaners is emitted into the atmosphere. Industry figures show
15 percent of the perc used ends up in air emissions.
At the Dec. 6 meeting, the South Coast
governing board directed the staff to review the air emissions
issue and other information that served as the basis for the
rule. A motion calling for an independent third-party review
was defeated, however.
Steve Risotto of the Halogenated
Solvents Industry Alliance said
the industry will continue working to convince the air district
that the risk factors and emissions levels have been
overstated. “We hope to put data in front of them that is
indisputable,” Risotto said.
The review is expected in two years at
which time the governing board could revisit the phase-out
schedule.
“Until then,” said IFI’s
Meijer, “we have to live with a potential phase-out and
elimination of perc in southern California.”
In the meantime, cleaners who want to
switch to a non-perc alternative may get some financial
assistance from SCAQMD. Also approved on Dec, 6 was $2 million
for grants of up to $10,000 for each drycleaner switching to
wetcleaning or carbon dioxide and up to $5,000 for each
drycleaner switching to hydrocarbon or silicone solvent.
The grants will be available on a
first-come, first-served basis. For the first nine months, 50
percent will be reserved for areas with low income and high
levels of cancer risk from air pollution.
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
