|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Editorials
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
A banner year, of sorts
A banner year? For whom, you no doubt ask.
For most cleaners, 2002 was a year of struggle to stay even.
But it was a banner year for the banners — the perc
banners, that is.
2002 will go down in the annals of the
industry as the year that brought the first ban on perc,
despite tenacious industry opposition in California. Of course,
the ban doesn’t actually take effect until 2020 and there
is still a possibility of reversal down the road. It will be a
continuing issue through 2003 and, we suspect, for many years
beyond.
Will the South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s action prove to be the high water
mark of the anti-perc campaigners, or will it be the beginning
of a wider movement to force cleaners to switch from their
favorite solvent? We have already seen one instance of a local
official picking up on the California action to propose a perc
ban in his own area. There will likely be others trying to wave
the banner of perc banning beyond southern California. Are you
ready for them when they come to your hometown?
Cleaning up the media
One thing to consider when reading an
editorial is the motive of the author. Opinionated writings are
designed to convey a message, take a stance, inspire change,
persuade, etc. So, as you read this (or any other subjective
piece of writing), bring along a grain of salt. Always keep in
mind that some writers are perfectly willing to obscure facts,
or twist the meaning of them, in order to suit their purpose
and sway the reader to their side.
Fortunately, newspapers are structured to
include sections exclusively for letters to the editor and
editorial commentary specifically so that people may wax
philosophical on controversial topics and voice their rants and
musings. The rest of the paper (minus those wonderful
advertisers) is for the news — just the facts. At least,
that’s how it’s supposed to be.
Unfortunately, sometimes a
“news” article is nothing more than propaganda
— and not even thinly-disguised propaganda at that. Good
examples of this can be found in some of the press releases
being issued lately by parties in the Greater Los Angeles basin
and Chicago who are seeking to ban perc in the industry. In
many cases, the articles are worded meticulously to imply
negative things about drycleaners without actually saying them.
An example springs to mind from an article
in the Dec. 18 issue of the Chicago Tribune, written by Peter
Sinsheimer and Robert Gottlieb. These men suggest that perc
must be banned because it cannot be monitored, writing:
“When cleaners do get monitored, non-compliance rates
have been extremely high, between 70 and 95 percent, according
to several studies.” The names of these so-called
studies are never mentioned, and there is no indication of the
number of cleaners who were examined, where they were located,
who performed each study, etc. Yet, the message is clear: most
cleaners are unethical and lazy, apparently. It’s one
thing to use numbers and figures to illustrate a point, but
when a news article references nameless studies without any
form of context, it is grossly irresponsible and unethically
manipulative. People who write such statements are only
interested in inciting their readers, not informing them. That
kind of writing should be reserved for the editorial pages.
What should cleaners do when this happens?
Should they fight fire with fire? It seems only fair, and yet,
water seems to be the better choice. The best method of
combatting rhetoric is not with more rhetoric. The truth is
much more effective. Unfortunately, once a fire is started, the
damage is often already done, even when that fire is
extinguished quickly. For cleaners, those fires have been
burning for far too long. No matter how much the industry
strives to improve, there is always a new attack, a new reason
for cleaners to be on the defensive. It will never get easier.
With that said, we’d like to proffer
kudos to all the industry members and groups who have responded
to all of the misleading stories in the news with words and
facts of their own, informing the public that cleaners actually
care about the environment and are committed to running their
businesses responsibly. Certainly, the job of a drycleaner is
frustrating at times, but perhaps it just comes with the
territory. After all, cleaners are experts on the removal of
dirt and stains.
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
