|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Collect your things – and
sign this!
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
hould employers get
a release when they fire someone? Employers sometimes pay
severance pay to ease the hardship of termination. It is not
unusual for that same former employee to bring a lawsuit or
file a discrimination charge, perhaps even using the severance
pay to retain a lawyer.
If there is no severance pay, a release
signed by an employee may not be valid because the employee has
received no benefit. In circumstances where no severance is
paid, consult an attorney before asking an employee to sign a
release.
Exchanging severance pay for a release can
be cheap insurance against future litigation. But beware,
employees cannot waive some rights, no matter what they sign.
For example, rights to workers’ compensation, minimum
wage, and overtime cannot be waived. It may be illegal even to
ask an employee to waive these rights.
There is also a risk that asking an
employee to sign a release will give him the idea that he has
good reason to sue.
One other thing to remember is that while
a waiver may be cheap insurance, it does not prevent the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) from filing a lawsuit
against an employer, nor does it prevent an employee from
filing a charge with the EEOC or cooperating with an
investigation. On average, however, the benefits of obtaining a
release generally outweigh the risks.
There used to be controversy over whether
an employee could waive civil rights and age discrimination
claims. The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA), which
became law in 1990, confirmed that employees can waive their
rights under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA),
and if a waiver of other civil rights claims — like race
discrimination — is valid if the waiver complies with the
OWBPA.
The problem is that making the waiver
effective is not a simple matter. The OWBPA says that a waiver
must be “knowing and voluntary” to be effective. In
fact, in some cases discussed below, the OWBPA requires
employers to hand over enough information for the employee (and
the employee’s lawyer) to “know” whether a
discrimination claim actually exists.
The OWBPA provides that the following
conditions must be satisfied for a waiver to be knowing and
voluntary:
1. The waiver
must be part of a written agreement between the employer and
the employee, and the agreement must be written so that the
employee can easily understand it.
2. The waiver
must specifically refer to rights and claims under the ADEA
(and/or other discrimination laws), so that the employee knows
exactly what rights he is waiving.
3. The waiver
cannot apply to claims that arise after the date of the
agreement. The employee can only waive claims arising from
something that happened in the past.
4. The
employee must receive consideration for the waiver. In other
words, the employee must get something — severance pay
for example — over and above what he is already entitled
to. The waiver is not effective if the employee is forced to
sign the agreement to get what he has already earned, or is
already entitled to receive.
5. The
employee must be advised to consult with an attorney before
signing the agreement. To be safe, the agreement should contain
a statement that the employee has been advised to consult with
an attorney.
6. In most
circumstances, the employee must be given at least 21 days to
consider signing the agreement. However, if the agreement is
part of a plan where a group of people will be leaving, such as
an early retirement incentive or a reduction in force, each
employee must be given at least 45 days to consider the
agreement.
7. The
employee must be able to change his mind for seven days after
the agreement is signed. The agreement does not become
effective until the end of the seven-day period.
8. If the
employer wants a group of employees to sign the agreement, the
agreement must list the groups or individuals the employer
wants to sign. The agreement must explain why the particular
individuals or groups were selected. It should also list any
applicable time limits.
Finally, the agreement must list the job
titles and ages of all the individuals selected, and the job
titles and ages of all the individuals in the same job
classifications who were not selected.
If it is just an individual employee who
is leaving or is being terminated, the requirements can be
satisfied without too much additional risk that the employee
will think he has a claim. If it is a group situation, the
OWBPA requires employers to provide potentially damaging
information.
The risk is that not only will the
employee think he has a claim, but that will be able to take
the release to a lawyer and the lawyer will be able to tell
whether a claim actually exists. Because the requirements are
so strict, many employers are willing to take their chances and
do without releases when dealing with a group.
If an employer decides to get a release,
it should contain a summary of benefits, severance payments,
and similar items the employee is being given in exchange for
the release.
If the employee owes money, there should
be a repayment schedule in the release. If the employee has a
contract, the release should confirm his covenant not to
compete.
Any outstanding claims or charges against
the employer should be specifically named in the release. The
release should also state how the employer will respond to
reference requests.
Finally, the release should contain
language demonstrating that the requirements of the OWBPA have
been satisfied.
Frank Kollman is a partner in the law firm
of Kollman & Saucier, PA, in Baltimore, MD. He can be
reached by phone at (410) 727-4300 or fax (410) 727-4391. His
firm’s web site at www.kollmanlaw.com has
articles, sample policies, news and other information on
employee/employer relations.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||

