Masthead.gif
hanger.gif
Insurance may cover cleanups
A recent Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision raises the possibility that cleanup claims may be covered by a drycleaner’s insurance policy.
The decision, issued July 11 in the case of Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, overturned a 1994 decision in City of Edgerton v. General Casualty Co.
In Edgerton, the Supreme Court held that environmental remediation costs incurred by an insured to clean up a contaminated site were not “damages” that were recoverable under comprehensive or commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policies.
The Edgerton decision also stated that receipt of a Responsible Party letter from a government agency ordering a party to respond to environmental contamination did not trigger an insurance company’s “duty to defend” the insured under these policies.
In Johnson Controls, the Supreme Court reversed its position and ruled that an insured’s costs of restoring and remediating damaged property, whether those costs were incurred by a third party (including the government) or the insured, constitute damages that are recoverable from the insurer under a commercial general liability policy.
The Court also decided that receipt of a Responsible Party letter from either the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or its state equivalent, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, “triggers” the insurer’s duty to defend its insured. Under Edgerton, an actual lawsuit had to be filed to trigger this duty.
According to Donald P. Gallo of the law firm of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c., Johnson Controls could prove to be of tremendous importance to those insured drycleaners who have incurred costs in responding to releases of contamination which occurred under historical CGL insurance policies, generally those policies issued between 1963 and 1985.
Gallo said that cleaners who have received a Responsible Party letter or incurred environmental cleanup costs which fit this situation, should consider immediately notifying their historical and current CGL carriers.
“In evaluating whether to notify your insurance carrier, you should carefully review your policy language, the potential defenses that the carriers could raise based on other policy language and the facts of your case,” Gallo said.