|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Ready to dryclean those washable suits?
Once again, cleaners must fend off an
attack from a competing product designed to divert dwindling
drycleaning dollars away from the industry. In recent years,
the market has seen the emergence of so-called home drycleaning
kits and appliances, such as Procter & Gamble’s Dryel
and Whirlpool’s Personal Valet. These products promised
to freshen up, dewrinkle and remove basic stains from clothes,
ultimately enticing consumers to make less trips to the
cleaners. Yet, none of these products actually cleaned clothes,
which might explain their limited success. Sure, a small
portion of the industry’s revenue has been stolen away,
but drycleaning is still the number one-option (by far) for
those who like their suit jackets finished, their shirts
starched and their pants creased just right.
Now, however, another player is taking a
swing at the industry. In September, J.C. Penney announced the
coming of the Stafford Washable Suit which never has to be
taken to the cleaners. It can be cleaned in the comfort of your
own home. How does this miracle suit work? According to J.C.
Penney, the company has replaced traditional suit interiors
with technologically superior components that can withstand the
wear and tear of home laundering. For a custom fit, the
two-button jacket and double-pleated cuffed pants are sold
separately at $190 and $80, respectively.
Once soiled, the garments are placed
inside a mesh bag and cleaned using a gentle wash cycle (with
your detergent of choice). Drying is accomplished by simply
hanging the washed suit and pants on a quality shaped hanger.
Once dry, J.C. Penney recommends a light touch up with an iron.
The suit is being marketed to people who seek a less expensive
and time-saving alternative to drycleaning. Yet, the garment
has to be washed, hung out to dry and ironed, which is hardly
quick or convenient. There is simply no comfort to be found in
cleaning clothes at home. As for the overall cost factor, it is
safe to assume that drycleaning is more expensive, but, as the
old adage goes: you get what you pay for.
It’s hard to believe somebody
thought a washable suit could capture some of the drycleaning
industry’s pool of potential profits. The final
proverbial nail in this product’s inevitable coffin is
that it is still capable of being drycleaned an interesting
quality for such a miracle garment to possess. It’s
almost if J.C. Penney realized that the suits will eventually
be stained and require a professional’s touch. It’s
almost as if the company itself realized that there is just no
substitute for the real thing.
Whose environment is it, anyway?
Sometimes it seems you just can’t
win.
Liquid carbon dioxide cleaning is
generally regarded as the most environmentally benign of all
the various solvent cleaning options available today. Even
those who are not big fans of the process acknowledge that
there is little or no chance of any air, soil or groundwater
pollution emanating from a carbon dioxide cleaning plant.
So it came as a surprise to learn that a
group of neighbors near a Hangers Cleaners plant in North
Carolina are mounting a campaign to keep the company from
expanding. The plant wants to install another CO2 machine to
boost its cleaning capacity. The neighbors don’t want it.
One nearby resident, in fact, has gone so far as to create an
entire web site (stophangers.infozone.com) explaining his vehement opposition to the expansion.
The opposition centers on environmental issues of a different
sort than those that cleaners, landlords and government
regulators usually concern themselves with. The opposing
neighbors are worried about the impact on their environment in
terms of noise and traffic. That, according to Bob Proctor,
author of the web page, apparent leader of the opposition and a
math professor at the University of North Carolina, will
degrade our living environment.
Too much traffic at the drycleaners? When
did this become a problem?
Ironically, it’s another UNC
professor who finds himself the target of Proctor’s
wrath. That would be Joseph DeSimone, familiar to many in the
industry as a developer of liquid carbon dioxide drycleaning
technology. He’s one of the owners of the Hangers plant.
Apparently in his effort to create an ecologically and socially
responsible cleaning system (as the Hangers Cleaners web site
puts it), he overlooked one thing: there’s no pleasing
some people when it comes to the environment.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||