|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
City, cleaner settle on contamination
The city of Lodi, CA, reached the first
settlement last month in its 15-year, $30 million battle to
force insurance companies to pay for the environmental cleanup
of drycleaning solvents that seeped underground.
The owners and insurers of the former Busy
Bee laundry site, one of 151 parties the city has sued in the
case, agreed to contract with pollution-cleanup firm E2CR Inc.
for $475,000 to get rid of the chemicals at the Main Street
site, a job that could take three to eight years to complete.
Under the settlement, the city will no
longer have to pay about $750,000 in judgments and attorneys
fees in Busy Bee’s own legal actions against Lodi. Busy
Bee will set up a $100,000 trust fund to cover any possible
cost overruns and contract breach.
The settlement requires the approval of
U.S. District Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr., who is presiding over
Lodi’s pollution case.
Busy Bee was one of nine cleaning
companies named when the city expanded its long-running lawsuit
last summer. Nearly all downtown Lodi companies that used
certain types of chemicals over the past 70 years were named in
the expanded suit.
Contamination was found in Lodi’s
drinking water back in the mid-1980s. Investigations in the
early 1990s found areas where trichloroethylene was disposed of
or where perchloroethylene from drycleaning operations was
disposed to the sewer system or directly to the ground.
California Regional Water Quality Board
officials, in a report filed in January, said they believe perc
leaked from the sewer to the soil and groundwater.
Earlier this year, Judge Damrell
criticized the city’s legal tactics in the case. The city
received a $16 million loan from Lehman Brothers to finance the
initial lawsuit in the belief that it could repay the loan with
proceeds from winning the suit. But Judge Damrell warned the
city a year ago that its prospects in the case looked bad and
the defendants had a good chance of prevailing. Nonetheless,
the city’s legal bills — and interest on the Lehman
loan, continued to mount. Over seven years, the city paid the
attorneys about $16 million and spent nearly $25 million
pursuing the case. Some reports pegged the interest rate on the
Lehman loan as high as 25 percent.
The city’s plan was to shift
clean-up costs to insurance companies, but after filing its
lawsuit in 2000, the defendants and their insurance companies
fought back, arguing that the city’s leaky sewers had
helped spread the contamination. The precedent for that
argument was set by IFI nearly 10 years ago when it was
embroiled in a contamination case at its former headquarters in
Silver Spring, MD.
In January, 2004, with a court date
imminent, the city fired both its city attorney and the legal
team that had presented it with a multi-million dollar bill.
Instead of pursuing litigation, the city told Judge Damrell
that it wanted to seek a settlement. The city also asked for a
four-month delay in the trial while it sought that settlement.
At a June hearing, Judge Damrell gave the
city two months to revise its lawsuit, which it did, just
before the deadline, with 153 defendants named.
Meanwhile, Lodi’s clean-up problems
could be worse than suspected. Tests on groundwater revealed
last month that perc was deeper in the soil and had spread
farther and in higher concentrations than were previously
expected.
The plume, the largest of five that are
contaminating groundwater in central Lodi, is suspected by city
and state officials to have come from a cluster of businesses
that includes Guild Cleaners and the former site of the Lodi
News-Sentinel newspaper.
Attorneys for the city, Guild Cleaners and
its insurers were unsuccessful in negotiating a settlement in a
10 hour meeting last month but planned to continue meeting.
If the city doesn’t settle with the
insurers soon, it may not be able to settle at all and instead
will have to rely solely on the assets of the Guild Cleaners
and its owner Jack Alquist.
Fireman’s Fund sued Guild Cleaners
in 1998, claiming it has no responsibility to cover pollution
claims, and contends any perc in the environment is due to
routine discharges from drycleaning, not the “sudden and
accidental” spills that would trigger coverage.
The case is scheduled for trial in San
Joaquin County Superior Court in January.
Hangers Cleaners ranks eighth in San
Diego’s Fast 100 List
When Gordon Shaw first opened a Hangers Cleaners store in San Diego back in 2001, it was the
first and only plant on the West Coast to use 100% all natural
liquid carbon dioxide as its cleaning solvent.
The maneuver may have seemed quite risky
at the time, but not anymore. Shaw’s Hangers Cleaners San
Diego has been named as the eighth fastest growing privately
held company in the city by The San Diego Business Journal.
Shaw, who has been a drycleaner for over
25 years, received the honor recently at a rooftop garden
reception hosted by The Journal, along with co-presenter Robert
Half International and co-sponsors Comerica, Grubb &
Ellis/BRE Commercial Real Estate, Luce Forward and the Westgate
Hotel.
Since opening the first plant in April of
2001, Shaw has opened an additional location in April of 2003
and has increased its overall revenue by 200%.
Shaw plans to open up two more plants
sometime in 2005 and make the Fast 100 list again next year.
“This was such a great event,”
he said upon being presented with a plaque that all of the Fast
100 companies received. During the ceremony, his business was
among those featured during a multimedia presentation.
Shaw attributes the company’s
success mostly to the good publicity it has been able to
generate often since it opened its doors.
“One the key things I’ve
learned, and benefited from over the past three and a half
years that I’ve had Hangers Cleaners is the tremendous
effect and punch of positive PR,” he explained.
“I’ve had six or seven periodicals run stories, 11
TV stories done, and a live talk radio hour; all because I am
the first in the area to do something truly revolutionary and
positive with the CO2 technology.”
Being placed near the top of the Fast 100
list is providing Shaw with another dose of free advertising,
as well. His business was featured in a story entitled
“Hangers Turns All-Natural Cleaning Into Unnatural
Success” in a special supplement of the October 4 issue
of The San Diego Business Journal.
“By far, this article is having the
largest impact in the context of real estate and the business
community,” he noted. “I look for a lot of doors to
open, as my brand is being built.”
Prior to his venture into carbon dioxide
cleaning, Shaw had built, owned and operated five perc plants,
three agencies and a gas station in San Diego County, the last
of which was sold in April of 2000. He has also served as
director, vice president and president of the San Diego
Drycleaners Association, and director and vice president of the
California Cleaners Association.
Since he began utilizing liquid carbon
dioxide to clean clothes, Shaw has testified before a
Congressional Sub-Committee in Washington on behalf of HR 1303,
the Dry Cleaning Environmental Tax Credit Bill, and has been a
recipient of San Diego County’s only 2001 Clean Air Award
in Recognition of his “Outstanding Contribution
Implementing Innovative Clean Air Technology.”
He has also played host to numerous
visitors. To date, several dozen cleaners, investors,
environmentalists and other interested parties have traveled
from all over the U.S. and countries such as Turkey, the United
Kingdom, Belgium, New Zealand and Canada to see CO2 in action.
|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||